Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink
CVE-2026-50554
5.3 MEDIUM
- CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
- Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
- Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
- Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
- User Interaction (UI): None (N)
- Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
- Confidentiality (C): Low (L)
- Integrity (I): None (N)
- Availability (A): None (N)
- Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
- Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
- Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
- Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
- Modified Confidentiality (MC): Low (L)
- Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
- Modified Integrity (MI): None (N)
- Modified Availability (MA): None (N)
Activity log
- Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
Note Mark: Unauthenticated disclosure of soft-deleted note metadata via deleted=true on public books in note-mark
Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. Prior to version 0.19.5, GET /api/books/{bookID}/notes is an unauthenticated endpoint that accepts a "deleted" query parameter. When the request is ?deleted=true, the service runs the query with Unscoped() (bypassing GORM's soft-delete scope) but keeps the read-authorization clause as "owner_id = ? OR is_public = ?". As a result, any unauthenticated caller can enumerate the metadata of soft-deleted ("trashed") notes belonging to any public book — notes the owner explicitly deleted and expected to be removed from public view. This issue has been patched in version 0.19.5.
References
-
https://github.com/enchant97/note-mark/security/advisories/GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf x_refsource_CONFIRMexploit
-
https://github.com/enchant97/note-mark/releases/tag/v0.19.5 x_refsource_MISC
Affected products
note-mark
- ==< 0.19.5