Nixpkgs security tracker

Login with GitHub
⚠️ You are using a production deployment that is still only suitable for demo purposes. Any work done in this might be wiped later without notice.

Suggestions search

With package: python314Packages.pydiscourse

Found 70 matching suggestions

View:
Compact
Detailed
Untriaged
Permalink CVE-2026-32099
4.3 MEDIUM
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): Low (L)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality (C): Low (L)
  • Integrity (I): None (N)
  • Availability (A): None (N)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): Low (L)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): Low (L)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): None (N)
  • Modified Availability (MA): None (N)
created 2 months, 1 week ago Activity log
  • Created suggestion
Discourse prevents hidden profile data leak via user onebox

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2, when a user has `hide_profile` enabled, their bio, location, and website were still exposed through the user onebox preview. An authenticated user could request a onebox for a hidden user's profile URL and receive their hidden profile fields (bio, location, website) in the response. Versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 contain a patch. No known workarounds are available.

Affected products

discourse
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.2
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.1
  • === 2026.3.0-latest

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
created 2 months, 1 week ago Activity log
  • Created suggestion
Discourse leaks private topic metadata to non-authorized users

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Versions prior to 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 have a vulnerability in an API endpoint that discloses private topic metadata of admin users to moderator users even if the moderators do not have access to the private topics. Versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 contain a patch. No known workarounds are available.

Affected products

discourse
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.2
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.1
  • === 2026.3.0-latest

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
created 2 months, 1 week ago Activity log
  • Created suggestion
Discourse discloses restricted post-action counts to non-privileged users

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2, a restriction bypass allows restricted post action counts to be disclosed to non-privileged users through a carefully crafted request. Versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 contain a patch. No known workarounds are available.

Affected products

discourse
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.2
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.1
  • === 2026.3.0-latest

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
created 3 months ago Activity log
  • Created suggestion
Discourse: Poll voters endpoint lacked post visibility checks

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, the voters endpoint in the poll plugin lacked post visibility checks which allowed unauthorized access to voters details of polls in any post. Versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 patch the issue. No known workarounds are available.

Affected products

discourse
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.1
  • ==< 2025.12.2
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.0

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
Permalink CVE-2026-26265
7.5 HIGH
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality (C): High (H)
  • Integrity (I): None (N)
  • Availability (A): None (N)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): High (H)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): None (N)
  • Modified Availability (MA): None (N)
created 3 months ago Activity log
  • Created suggestion
Discourse has IDOR vulnerability in the directory items endpoint

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, an IDOR vulnerability in the directory items endpoint allows any user, including anonymous users, to retrieve private user field values for all users in the directory. The `user_field_ids` parameter in `DirectoryItemsController#index` accepts arbitrary user field IDs without authorization checks, bypassing the visibility restrictions (`show_on_profile` / `show_on_user_card`) that are enforced elsewhere (e.g., `UserCardSerializer` via `Guardian#allowed_user_field_ids`). An attacker can request `GET /directory_items.json?period=all&user_field_ids=<id>` with any private field ID and receive that field's value for every user in the directory response. This enables bulk exfiltration of private user data such as phone numbers, addresses, or other sensitive custom fields that admins have explicitly configured as non-public. The issue is patched in versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 by filtering `user_field_ids` against `UserField.public_fields` for non-staff users before building the custom field map. As a workaround, site administrators can remove sensitive data from private user fields, or disable the user directory via the `enable_user_directory` site setting.

Affected products

discourse
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.1
  • ==< 2025.12.2
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.0

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
created 3 months ago Activity log
  • Created suggestion
Discourse: TL4 users are able to change status of restricted topics

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, TL4 users are able to close, archive and pin topics in private categories they don't have access to. Versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 patch the issue. No known workarounds are available.

Affected products

discourse
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.1
  • ==< 2025.12.2
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.0

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
created 3 months ago Activity log
  • Created suggestion
Discourse doesn't ensure guardian check when creating QueryGroupBookmark

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, missing `validate_before_create` authorization in Data Explorer's `QueryGroupBookmarkable` allows any logged-in user to create bookmarks for query groups they don't have access to, enabling metadata disclosure via bookmark reminder notifications. Versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 fix this issue and also make sure `validate_before_create` throws NotImplementedError in BaseBookmarkable if not implemented, to prevent similar issues in the future. No known workarounds are available.

Affected products

discourse
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.1
  • ==< 2025.12.2
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.0

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
created 3 months ago Activity log
  • Created suggestion
Discourse's Fail-Open Access Control in Data Explorer Plugin Allows Unauthorized SQL Query Execution

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, fail-open access control in Data Explorer plugin allows any authenticated user to execute SQL queries that have no explicit group assignments, including built-in system queries. Versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 patch the issue. As a workaround, either explicitly set group permissions on each Data Explorer query that doesn't have permissions, or disable discourse-data-explorer plugin.

Affected products

discourse
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.1
  • ==< 2025.12.2
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.0

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
Permalink CVE-2026-26207
5.4 MEDIUM
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): Low (L)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality (C): Low (L)
  • Integrity (I): Low (L)
  • Availability (A): None (N)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): Low (L)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): Low (L)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): Low (L)
  • Modified Availability (MA): None (N)
created 3 months ago Activity log
  • Created suggestion
DIscourse's discourse-policy plugin lacks post access check

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, `discourse-policy` plugin allows any authenticated user to interact with policies on posts they do not have permission to view. The `PolicyController` loads posts by ID without verifying the current user's access, enabling policy group members to accept/unaccept policies on posts in private categories or PMs they cannot see and any authenticated user to enumerate which post IDs have policies attached via differentiated error responses (information disclosure). The issue is patched in versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 by adding a `guardian.can_see?(@post)` check in the `set_post` before_action, ensuring post visibility is verified before any policy action is processed. As a workaround, disabling the discourse-policy plugin (`policy_enabled = false`) eliminates the vulnerability. There is no other workaround without upgrading.

Affected products

discourse
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.1
  • ==< 2025.12.2
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.0

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
created 3 months ago Activity log
  • Created suggestion
Discourse Vulnerable to Unauthorized Topic Creation in Staff-Only Categories via Topic Timer publish_to_category

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, TL4 users can publish topics into staff-only categories via the `publish_to_category` topic timer, bypassing authorization checks. Versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 patch the issue. No known workarounds are available.

Affected products

discourse
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.1
  • ==< 2025.12.2
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.0

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers