picklescan before 0.0.30 fails to detect malicious pickle files that exploit lib2to3.pgen2.pgen.ParserGenerator.make_label function in the reduce method. Attackers can craft malicious pickle files with embedded code that evades detection but executes arbitrary commands when pickle.load() is called.

A weakness has been identified in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. The impacted element is the function AIAgent.run_conversation of the file run_agent.py of the component HTTP API. This manipulation of the argument todos causes denial of service. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Picklescan before 0.0.33 fails to detect the numpy.f2py.crackfortran.getlincoef gadget in pickle __reduce__ methods, allowing arbitrary code execution. Attackers can craft malicious pickle files that execute arbitrary Python code when loaded, bypassing Picklescan's safety checks and enabling supply-chain poisoning of shared model files.

PHPIPAM is affected by an authenticated local file inclusion vulnerability that allows users with access to the API to execute/include arbitrary PHP files on the web server's file system. The API is not enabled by default on installations.

picklescan before 0.0.34 fails to detect _operator.attrgetter function calls in pickle payloads, allowing attackers to bypass security checks. Remote attackers can craft malicious pickle files using _operator.attrgetter in reduce methods to execute arbitrary code when pickle.load() processes the file.

A security vulnerability has been detected in code-projects Online Voting System up to 0.x/1.0. This issue affects the function test_input of the file /authentication.php of the component Login. Such manipulation of the argument adminUserName/adminPassword leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

A flaw has been found in RT-Thread up to 5.2.2. Affected is the function read/write/sys_ioctl of the file components/lwp/lwp_syscall.c of the component Parameter Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to divide by zero. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.

A vulnerability was identified in SourceCodester Simple and Nice Shopping Cart Script 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/girlsproductdeletequery.php. Such manipulation of the argument user_id leads to sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

In nltk/nltk versions 3.9.3 and earlier, five Stanford interface classes (StanfordPOSTagger, StanfordNERTagger, StanfordParser, StanfordDependencyParser, and StanfordNeuralDependencyParser) are vulnerable to untrusted JAR code execution. These classes accept user-controllable JAR paths and execute them via the `java()` function, which invokes `subprocess.Popen()` without integrity verification. This vulnerability is identical to CVE-2026-0848, which was fixed for StanfordSegmenter by adding SHA256 verification. However, the fix was not applied to these additional classes, leaving them susceptible to arbitrary code execution when loading untrusted JAR files.

A vulnerability has been found in ForceInjection AI-fundermentals 2.0/3.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function get_conversation_history of the file 08_agentic_system/memory/langchain/code/smart_customer_service.py of the component Memory Recall Handler. The manipulation leads to use of weak hash. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is f57277fdd9ba373ace72d83c272023ec67f720d6. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue. The project confirms (translated from Chinese): "We now require session ownership verification in methods such as `username`, `sessionowner`, etc., and we've chat()changed the generation of `sessionowner` to include verified user identity and security context metadata."