Nixpkgs security tracker

Try the new UI
Login with GitHub
⚠️ You are using a production deployment that is still only suitable for demo purposes. Any work done in this might be wiped later without notice.

Dismissed suggestions

These automatic suggestions were dismissed after initial triaging.

to select a suggestion for revision.

View:
Compact
Detailed
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
updated 2 days, 17 hours ago by @ADMIN Activity log
  • Created suggestion
  • @ADMIN dismissed (no matching packages found)
Fault injection attack with ML-DSA and ML-KEM on ARM

Protection mechanism failure in wolfCrypt post-quantum implementations (ML-KEM and ML-DSA) in wolfSSL on ARM Cortex-M microcontrollers allows a physical attacker to compromise key material and/or cryptographic outcomes via induced transient faults that corrupt or redirect seed/pointer values during Keccak-based expansion. This issue affects wolfSSL (wolfCrypt): commit hash d86575c766e6e67ef93545fa69c04d6eb49400c6.

References

Affected products

wolfssl
  • <5.9.0
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
updated 2 days, 17 hours ago by @ADMIN Activity log
  • Created suggestion
  • @ADMIN dismissed (no matching packages found)
Buffer overflow in CRL number parsing in wolfSSL

Two buffer overflow vulnerabilities existed in the wolfSSL CRL parser when parsing CRL numbers: a heap-based buffer overflow could occur when improperly storing the CRL number as a hexadecimal string, and a stack-based overflow for sufficiently sized CRL numbers. With appropriately crafted CRLs, either of these out of bound writes could be triggered. Note this only affects builds that specifically enable CRL support, and the user would need to load a CRL from an untrusted source.

Affected products

wolfSSL
  • <5.9.0
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
updated 2 days, 17 hours ago by @ADMIN Activity log
  • Created suggestion
  • @ADMIN dismissed (no matching packages found)
Integer underflow leads to out-of-bounds access in sniffer AES-GCM/CCM/ARIA-GCM decrypt path

Integer underflow in wolfSSL packet sniffer <= 5.8.4 allows an attacker to cause a buffer overflow in the AEAD decryption path by injecting a TLS record shorter than the explicit IV plus authentication tag into traffic inspected by ssl_DecodePacket. The underflow wraps a 16-bit length to a large value that is passed to AEAD decryption routines, causing heap buffer overflow and a crash. An unauthenticated attacker can trigger this remotely via malformed TLS Application Data records.

Affected products

wolfSSL
  • =<5.8.4
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
updated 2 days, 17 hours ago by @ADMIN Activity log
  • Created suggestion
  • @ADMIN dismissed (no matching packages found)
Stack buffer overflow in PKCS7 SignedData encoding with custom signed attributes

A stack buffer overflow vulnerability exists in wolfSSL's PKCS7 SignedData encoding functionality. In wc_PKCS7_BuildSignedAttributes(), when adding custom signed attributes, the code passes an incorrect capacity value (esd->signedAttribsCount) to EncodeAttributes() instead of the remaining available space in the fixed-size signedAttribs[7] array. When an application sets pkcs7->signedAttribsSz to a value greater than MAX_SIGNED_ATTRIBS_SZ (default 7) minus the number of default attributes already added, EncodeAttributes() writes beyond the array bounds, causing stack memory corruption. In WOLFSSL_SMALL_STACK builds, this becomes heap corruption. Exploitation requires an application that allows untrusted input to control the signedAttribs array size when calling wc_PKCS7_EncodeSignedData() or related signing functions.

References

Affected products

wolfSSL
  • <5.9.0
Dismissed
(exclusively hosted service)
Permalink CVE-2026-32194
9.8 CRITICAL
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality (C): High (H)
  • Integrity (I): High (H)
  • Availability (A): High (H)
  • Exploit Code Maturity (E): Unproven (U)
  • Remediation Level (RL): Official Fix (O)
  • Report Confidence (RC): Confirmed (C)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): High (H)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): High (H)
  • Modified Availability (MA): High (H)
created 5 months, 4 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created suggestion
Microsoft Bing Images Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Microsoft Bing Images allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Affected products

Microsoft Bing Images
  • ==-
Dismissed
(exclusively hosted service)
Permalink CVE-2026-23658
8.6 HIGH
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Scope (S): Changed (C)
  • Confidentiality (C): High (H)
  • Integrity (I): None (N)
  • Availability (A): None (N)
  • Exploit Code Maturity (E): Unproven (U)
  • Remediation Level (RL): Official Fix (O)
  • Report Confidence (RC): Confirmed (C)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): High (H)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Changed (C)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): None (N)
  • Modified Availability (MA): None (N)
created 5 months, 4 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created suggestion
Azure DevOps: msazure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Insufficiently protected credentials in Azure DevOps allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Affected products

Azure DevOps: msazure
  • ==-
Dismissed
(exclusively hosted service)
Permalink CVE-2026-26136
6.5 MEDIUM
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): Required (R)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality (C): High (H)
  • Integrity (I): None (N)
  • Availability (A): None (N)
  • Exploit Code Maturity (E): Unproven (U)
  • Remediation Level (RL): Official Fix (O)
  • Report Confidence (RC): Confirmed (C)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): Required (R)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): High (H)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): None (N)
  • Modified Availability (MA): None (N)
created 5 months, 4 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created suggestion
Microsoft Copilot Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Microsoft Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Affected products

Microsoft Copilot
  • ==-
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink CVE-2026-3547
7.5 HIGH
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality (C): None (N)
  • Integrity (I): None (N)
  • Availability (A): High (H)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): None (N)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): None (N)
  • Modified Availability (MA): High (H)
updated 2 days, 17 hours ago by @ADMIN Activity log
  • Created suggestion
  • @ADMIN dismissed (no matching packages found)
wolfSSL: out-of-bounds read (DoS) in ALPN parsing due to incomplete validation

Out-of-bounds read in ALPN parsing due to incomplete validation. wolfSSL 5.8.4 and earlier contained an out-of-bounds read in ALPN handling when built with ALPN enabled (HAVE_ALPN / --enable-alpn). A crafted ALPN protocol list could trigger an out-of-bounds read, leading to a potential process crash (denial of service). Note that ALPN is disabled by default, but is enabled for these 3rd party compatibility features: enable-apachehttpd, enable-bind, enable-curl, enable-haproxy, enable-hitch, enable-lighty, enable-jni, enable-nginx, enable-quic.

Affected products

wolfSSL
  • <5.9.0
Dismissed
(exclusively hosted service)
Permalink CVE-2026-26139
8.6 HIGH
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Scope (S): Changed (C)
  • Confidentiality (C): High (H)
  • Integrity (I): None (N)
  • Availability (A): None (N)
  • Exploit Code Maturity (E): Proof-of-Concept (P)
  • Remediation Level (RL): Official Fix (O)
  • Report Confidence (RC): Confirmed (C)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): High (H)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Changed (C)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): None (N)
  • Modified Availability (MA): None (N)
created 5 months, 4 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created suggestion
Microsoft Purview Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Purview allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Affected products

Microsoft Purview
  • ==-
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
updated 2 days, 17 hours ago by @ADMIN Activity log
  • Created suggestion
  • @ADMIN dismissed (no matching packages found)
Improper key_share validation in TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client's authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.

Affected products

wolfSSL
  • <5.9.0