Nixpkgs security tracker

Try the new UI
Login with GitHub
⚠️ You are using a production deployment that is still only suitable for demo purposes. Any work done in this might be wiped later without notice.

Dismissed suggestions

These automatic suggestions were dismissed after initial triaging.

to select a suggestion for revision.

View:
Compact
Detailed
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
created 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
None

None

Affected products

Dismissed
(max. allowed matches exceeded)
created 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (max. allowed matches exceeded) suggestion
powerpc/hv-gpci: fix preempt count leak in sysfs show paths

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/hv-gpci: fix preempt count leak in sysfs show paths Four sysfs show() callbacks in hv-gpci take get_cpu_var(hv_gpci_reqb) (which calls preempt_disable()) but only call the matching put_cpu_var() on the error path under the 'out:' label. Every successful read leaks one preempt_disable(): processor_bus_topology_show() processor_config_show() affinity_domain_via_virtual_processor_show() affinity_domain_via_domain_show() (affinity_domain_via_partition_show() was already correct.) On a CONFIG_PREEMPT=y kernel, repeated reads raise preempt_count and eventually return to userspace with preemption still disabled. The next user-mode page fault then hits faulthandler_disabled() == 1, gets forced to SIGSEGV, and the resulting coredump trips 'BUG: scheduling while atomic' in call_usermodehelper_exec -> wait_for_completion_state -> schedule: BUG: scheduling while atomic: <task>/<pid>/0x00000004 ... __schedule_bug+0x6c/0x90 __schedule+0x58c/0x13a0 schedule+0x48/0x1a0 schedule_timeout+0x104/0x170 wait_for_completion_state+0x16c/0x330 call_usermodehelper_exec+0x254/0x2d0 vfs_coredump+0x1050/0x2590 get_signal+0xb9c/0xc80 do_notify_resume+0xf8/0x470 Add an out_success label that calls put_cpu_var() before returning the byte count, mirroring affinity_domain_via_partition_show().

Affected products

Linux
  • =<*
  • ==6.6
  • <b61ebb2826ca1852c2bbd92a676fb622c358cab4
  • <45afabe7f99c5d8746434ee41c86584c01d70147
  • <903409000a07ac8e31ffedeb8516f4f8d67150c8
  • =<7.0.*
  • <b300312562fd6e4729697adb9f777f00ca0429f3
  • =<6.18.*
  • <6.6
  • =<6.12.*
  • =<6.6.*
  • <dbc30a57bd8e026995e9fa8e8c31cffd18542c01
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink CVE-2026-78604
7.8 HIGH
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Local (L)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): Low (L)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality (C): High (H)
  • Integrity (I): High (H)
  • Availability (A): High (H)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Local (L)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): Low (L)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): High (H)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): High (H)
  • Modified Availability (MA): High (H)
created 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource in Elastic Agent Leading to Local Privilege Escalation to SYSTEM

Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource (CWE-732) in Elastic Agent can lead to local privilege escalation via Replace Binaries (CAPEC-642). On Windows systems where Elastic Agent is installed in unprivileged mode, resources used by the agent service are created with access controls broader than required. A local user could take advantage of this to cause the service to execute code of their choosing, ultimately obtaining SYSTEM-level privileges on the host.

Affected products

Elastic Agent
  • =<9.5.1
  • =<9.4.5
  • =<8.19.20
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink CVE-2026-81201
6.1 MEDIUM
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): Required (R)
  • Scope (S): Changed (C)
  • Confidentiality (C): Low (L)
  • Integrity (I): Low (L)
  • Availability (A): None (N)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): Required (R)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): Low (L)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Changed (C)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): Low (L)
  • Modified Availability (MA): None (N)
created 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
Monster Menus - Moderately critical - Cross-site Scripting - SA-CONTRIB-2026-116

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Monster Menus allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Monster Menus versions: from 0.0.0 to 9.5.3.

Affected products

Monster Menus
  • <9.5.3
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink CVE-2026-76756
5.9 MEDIUM
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): High (H)
  • Privileges Required (PR): High (H)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality (C): High (H)
  • Integrity (I): High (H)
  • Availability (A): None (N)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): High (H)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): High (H)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): High (H)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): High (H)
  • Modified Availability (MA): None (N)
created 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
Gammu SMS Daemon - Critical - Unsupported - SA-CONTRIB-2026-100

Vulnerability in Drupal Gammu SMS Daemon. This issue affects Gammu SMS Daemon versions: *.*.

Affected products

Gammu SMS Daemon
  • ==*.*
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink CVE-2026-77792
7.5 HIGH
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): High (H)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): Required (R)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality (C): High (H)
  • Integrity (I): High (H)
  • Availability (A): High (H)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): High (H)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): Required (R)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): High (H)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): High (H)
  • Modified Availability (MA): High (H)
created 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
RegistrationMagic < 6.0.9.9 - Unauthenticated Stored XSS via Rating Field

The RegistrationMagic WordPress plugin before 6.0.9.9 does not escape a registration form field value before outputting it in an HTML attribute on an administrative page, allowing unauthenticated users to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks against high privilege users such as admin.

References

Affected products

RegistrationMagic
  • <6.0.9.9
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink CVE-2025-15664
6.8 MEDIUM
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): High (H)
  • User Interaction (UI): Required (R)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality (C): High (H)
  • Integrity (I): High (H)
  • Availability (A): High (H)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): High (H)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): Required (R)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): High (H)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): High (H)
  • Modified Availability (MA): High (H)
created 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
BEAF < 4.7.19 - Author+ Stored XSS via Before Label

The Ultimate Before After Image Slider & Gallery WordPress plugin before 4.7.19 does not properly escape the slider's before-label value before its bundled client-side script re-injects it into the DOM, allowing users with the Author role and above to store a payload that executes in the browser of anyone (including an administrator) who views the slider.

References

Affected products

Ultimate Before After Image Slider & Gallery
  • <4.7.19
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink CVE-2026-52833
8.0 HIGH
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): High (H)
  • Privileges Required (PR): High (H)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Scope (S): Changed (C)
  • Confidentiality (C): High (H)
  • Integrity (I): High (H)
  • Availability (A): High (H)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): High (H)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): High (H)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): High (H)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Changed (C)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): High (H)
  • Modified Availability (MA): High (H)
created 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
Nuclio: Unsanitized runtimeAttributes.repositories injected into Groovy build.gradle leads to build-time RCE

Nuclio is a "Serverless" framework for Real-Time Events and Data Processing. Prior to version 1.16.5, Nuclio's Java runtime generates a build.gradle file during function builds using Go's text/template package. The template renders runtimeAttributes.repositories[] values with the {{ . }} action, which performs no escaping. An attacker can embed a closing brace (}) to break out of the repositories {} block and append arbitrary Groovy statements that execute unconditionally during the Gradle configuration phase. This issue has been patched in version 1.16.5.

Affected products

nuclio
  • ==< 1.16.5
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink CVE-2026-20281
7.5 HIGH
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality (C): None (N)
  • Integrity (I): None (N)
  • Availability (A): High (H)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): None (N)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): None (N)
  • Modified Availability (MA): High (H)
created 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
Cisco Desk Phone 9800 Series, IP Phone 7800 and 8800 Series, and Video Phone 8875 with SIP Software Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in Cisco Desk Phone 9800 Series, Cisco IP Phone 7800 and 8800 Series, and Cisco Video Phone 8875 that are running Cisco Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper memory management when an affected device processes HTTP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a continuous stream of crafted HTTP packets to the device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to continuously consume memory, resulting in a DoS condition.&nbsp;A manual reboot of the device is required to recover from this condition. Note: For this vulnerability to be exploitable, the phone must be registered to Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) and have Web Access enabled. Web Access is disabled by default.

Affected products

Cisco Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Software
  • ==11.0(3)
  • ==10.3(1)SR5
  • ==12.7(1)SR1
  • ==12.1(1)SR1
  • ==11.0(0.7) MPP
  • ==14.0(1)
  • ==14.2(1)SR2
  • ==11.0(2)SR1
  • ==12.8(1)
  • ==11.0(3)SR3
  • ==11.0(3)SR2
  • ==14.1(1)SR1
  • ==4.1(1)
  • ==12.8(1)SR2
  • ==14.1(1)
  • ==11.0(5)SR1
  • ==10.3(1)SR3
  • ==14.3(1)SR2
  • ==14.2(1)
  • ==9.3(3)
  • ==14.2(1)SR3
  • ==11.0(6)SR6
  • ==14.2(1)SR1
  • ==10.2(2)
  • ==14.3(1)SR1
  • ==4.1(1)SR1
  • ==9.3(4)SR3 3rd Party
  • ==14.0(1)SR1
  • ==14.2(1)SR4
  • ==11.0(3)SR4
  • ==11.0(3)SR6
  • ==14.1(1)SR3
  • ==11.7(1)
  • ==10.3(1)
  • ==12.1(1)
  • ==2.0(1)
  • ==11.0(4)SR3
  • ==11.0(2)
  • ==10.3(1)SR2
  • ==10.4(1)SR2 3rd Party
  • ==11-0-1MSR1-1
  • ==3.0(1)
  • ==3.1(1)SR1
  • ==12.5(1)SR2
  • ==10.3(1.11) 3rd Party
  • ==3.1(1)
  • ==2.1(1)
  • ==12.0(1)
  • ==11.0(4)SR1
  • ==10.3(2)
  • ==12.8(1)SR1
  • ==3.2(1)
  • ==2.3(1)
  • ==14.4(1)
  • ==12.0(1)SR2
  • ==11.0(6)SR7
  • ==12.5(1)SR3
  • ==11.0(1)
  • ==3.5(1)SR1
  • ==10.1(1.9)
  • ==12.6(1)
  • ==3.6(1)
  • ==14.0(1)SR2
  • ==14.3(1)SR3
  • ==4.0(1)
  • ==11.0(6)SR1
  • ==11.0(4)
  • ==2.3(1)SR1
  • ==11.0(6)
  • ==3.5(1)
  • ==12.5(1)SR1
  • ==10.3(1)SR4b
  • ==10.2(1)SR1
  • ==10.3(1)SR6
  • ==11.0(5)SR2
  • ==9.3(4) 3rd Party
  • ==12.5(1)
  • ==12.7(1)
  • ==14.3(1)
  • ==10.4(1) 3rd Party
  • ==10.2(1)
  • ==11.0(6)SR5
  • ==10.1(1)SR1
  • ==11.5(1)SR1
  • ==14.4(1)SR1
  • ==10.1(1)SR2
  • ==11.0(3)SR1
  • ==3.4(1)
  • ==10.3(1.9) 3rd Party
  • ==9.3(4)SR2 3rd Party
  • ==11.0(6)SR2
  • ==2.2(1)
  • ==14.1(1)SR2
  • ==11.5(1)
  • ==11.0(4)SR2
  • ==10.3(1)SR1
  • ==11.0(5)SR3
  • ==11.0(3)SR5
  • ==3.3(1)
  • ==11.0(2)SR2
  • ==10.3(1)SR7
  • ==10.3(1)SR4
  • ==12.6(1)SR1
  • ==9.3(4)SR1 3rd Party
  • ==11.0(6)SR4
  • ==14.0(1)SR3
  • ==11.0(5)
  • ==12.0(1)SR1
  • ==14.4(1)SR2
  • ==12.0(1)SR3
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink CVE-2026-83533
5.3 MEDIUM
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality (C): None (N)
  • Integrity (I): Low (L)
  • Availability (A): None (N)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): None (N)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): Low (L)
  • Modified Availability (MA): None (N)
created 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
WP Express Checkout < 2.4.9 - Unauthenticated Payment Bypass via wpec_process_payment

The WP Express Checkout WordPress plugin before 2.4.9 does not verify server-side that a payment was actually completed before marking an order as paid, allowing unauthenticated users to forge a completed order without paying.

References

Affected products

WP Express Checkout
  • <2.4.9