IBM Portieris 0.5.0 through 0.14.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass image policy enforcement due to improper authorization of pod owner references.

The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.21 does not verify ownership before allowing schedule records to be modified or deleted, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to alter or delete schedule entries created by other users.

A vulnerability was identified in chenhg5 cc-connect up to 1.4.1. This affects the function shellExecCommand of the file core/engine.go of the component Management API. Such manipulation of the argument exec leads to os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

An issue in Berkeley Out-of-Order Machine (BOOM) / BoomTile RTL benchmark v1.2 2d08d0d8b4563212175212f9db0e69f6e68c9619 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the CSR trap-return state restoration logic, MRET handling logic, mstatus.MPRV update path, CSRFile logic in ProcessorFuzz BOOM benchmark Benchmarks/Verilog/SmallBoomTile_v1.2_state.v

In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.6.0, a user who holds the "Automation Engineer" Splunk SOAR role could run arbitrary Structured Query Language (SQL) statements against the Splunk SOAR database through custom list retrieval in a playbook, allowing for create, read, update, and delete operations on all relevant data stored in the Splunk SOAR database. The SQL injection is possible because Splunk SOAR builds the custom list database lookup with the supplied list name instead of a bound SQL value. For more information see Manage roles and permissions in Splunk SOAR (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-cloud/administer-soar-cloud/manage-your-splunk-soar-cloud-users-and-accounts/manage-roles-and-permissions-in-splunk-soar-cloud) and Create custom lists for use in Splunk SOAR playbook comparisons (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-cloud/build-playbooks/manage-playbooks-and-playbook-settings/create-custom-lists-for-use-in-splunk-soar-cloud-playbook-comparisons) in the Splunk documentation.

Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Nikstore Core <= 1.5 versions.

The Ingenic T41, and probably also T32, T40, and A1 SoC boot ROMs parse and execute an attacker-controlled init table from the SPL header before checking the secure boot state and before invoking signature verification. The init table parser supports full-address 32-bit write operations, allowing modification of SRAM-resident secure boot state prior to the verification decision. An attacker with physical write access to boot media can inject an init-table entry that disables the secure boot check, causing the ROM to accept unsigned or modified first-stage boot code. This has been hardware-validated on a secureboot-enabled T41 device; ROM analysis confirms closely related behavior on T32, T40, and A1.

phpMyFAQ before 4.1.7 (affected versions <= 4.1.5) fails to persist the WebAuthn login challenge generated by prepareForLogin, because neither WebAuthn controller saves the mutated key objects back to the database. At login the anti-replay comparison is skipped by its own null guard, allowing an attacker who captures a successful WebAuthn assertion to replay it indefinitely and authenticate as the user without any interaction or hardware key.

stigmem versions before 0.9.0a12 contain a broken object level authorization vulnerability in the decay sweep endpoint that allows authenticated attackers with write credentials for one tenant to execute decay operations affecting all tenants. Attackers can submit POST requests to the decay sweep endpoint with ttl_seconds=0 to expire facts across all tenants, or use dry_run to obtain cross-tenant fact counts and existence information.

None