Nixpkgs security tracker

Login with GitHub
⚠️ You are using a production deployment that is still only suitable for demo purposes. Any work done in this might be wiped later without notice.

Dismissed suggestions

These automatic suggestions were dismissed after initial triaging.

to select a suggestion for revision.

View:
Compact
Detailed
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink CVE-2026-60085
8.7 HIGH
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 4.0
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Attack Requirement (AT): None (N)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Vulnerable System Impact Confidentiality (VC): High (H)
  • Vulnerable System Impact Integrity (VI): None (N)
  • Vulnerable System Impact Availability (VA): None (N)
  • Subsequent System Impact Confidentiality (SC): None (N)
  • Subsequent System Impact Integrity (SI): None (N)
  • Subsequent System Impact Availability (SA): None (N)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Attack Requirement (MAT): None (N)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Vulnerable System Impact Confidentiality (MVC): High (H)
  • Modified Vulnerable System Impact Integrity (MVI): None (N)
  • Modified Vulnerable System Impact Availability (MVA): None (N)
  • Modified Subsequent System Impact Confidentiality (MSC): Negligible (N)
  • Modified Subsequent System Impact Integrity (MSI): Negligible (N)
  • Modified Subsequent System Impact Availability (MSA): Negligible (N)
  • Safety (S): Not Defined (X)
  • Automatable (AU): Not Defined (X)
  • Recovery (R): Not Defined (X)
  • Value Density (V): Not Defined (X)
  • Vulnerability Response Effort (RE): Not Defined (X)
  • Provider Urgency (U): Not Defined (X)
  • Confidentiality Req. (CR): Not Defined (X)
  • Integrity Req. (IR): Not Defined (X)
  • Availability Req. (AR): Not Defined (X)
  • Exploit Maturity (E): Not Defined (X)
created 1 month, 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
PraisonAI before 4.6.78 Unenforced Security Policy in Subprocess Sandbox

PraisonAI before 4.6.78 contains an unenforced security policy vulnerability in the default Subprocess Sandbox backend where blocked_commands, blocked_paths, blocked_imports, allow_subprocess, and allow_file_write restrictions are completely ignored. Attackers can execute arbitrary subprocess commands, read sensitive files, and perform destructive operations despite explicit security policy configuration.

Affected products

PraisonAI
  • ==4.6.78
  • <4.6.78
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
created 1 month, 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
None

None

Affected products

Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink CVE-2026-20296
8.3 HIGH
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): Required (R)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality (C): High (H)
  • Integrity (I): High (H)
  • Availability (A): Low (L)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): Required (R)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): High (H)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): High (H)
  • Modified Availability (MA): Low (L)
created 1 month, 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
SPL Command Safeguards Bypass through Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Deployment Server in Splunk Enterprise

In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.1, 10.2.5, 10.0.8, and 9.4.13, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.5.2605.0, 10.4.2604.7, 10.3.2512.16, 10.2.2510.18, and 10.1.2507.24, an attacker could trick a user that holds a role with the `list_deployment_server` capability into running arbitrary Search Processing Language (SPL) searches on their behalf as `splunk-system-user`, allowing for access to stored credentials and indexed data.<br><br>The vulnerability is possible because Deployment Server endpoints in Splunk Web do not validate Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) tokens on GET requests, and caller-supplied input is not correctly neutralized before it is placed into an SPL search.

Affected products

Splunk Enterprise
  • <10.0.8
  • <10.2.5
  • <10.4.1
  • <9.4.13
Splunk Cloud Platform
  • <10.4.2604.7
  • <10.2.2510.18
  • <10.5.2605.0
  • <10.3.2512.16
  • <10.1.2507.24
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink CVE-2026-54458
9.6 CRITICAL
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): Required (R)
  • Scope (S): Changed (C)
  • Confidentiality (C): High (H)
  • Integrity (I): High (H)
  • Availability (A): Low (L)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): Required (R)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): High (H)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Changed (C)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): High (H)
  • Modified Availability (MA): Low (L)
created 1 month, 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin

WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. Versions prior to 29.0 contain a stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the YPTSocket plugin. Any unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the authenticated origin of every administrator currently viewing a page that renders the YPTSocket online-users debug panel. plugin/YPTSocket/getWebSocket.json.php issues a signed WebSocket token to any anonymous caller, and MessageSQLiteV2::onOpen at plugin/YPTSocket/MessageSQLiteV2.php lines 91 and 110 reads the attacker-controlled webSocketSelfURI and page_title query parameters from the WebSocket connection URL with no validation. Both values persist into the in-memory SQLite connections table and broadcast inside the users_id_online array sent to every connected client; on the client, plugin/YPTSocket/script.js::updateSocketUserCard interpolates the broadcast page_title into an HTML template literal that is passed to jQuery $.append(html), which parses attacker bytes into live DOM nodes including <img> with inline event handlers. Successful attackers can can read non-HttpOnly cookies and the CSRF token rendered into the admin dashboard, issue authenticated requests to any admin-only endpoint, exfiltrate the admin dashboard DOM, and chain into any admin-context mutation. When the victim is an AVideo administrator, the attacker turns a single anonymous WebSocket connection into full administrative takeover via the admin's own session. This issue has been patched by https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/commit/8be71e53ccbe9b84b30870db386fb4d2b11e1c16.

Affected products

AVideo
  • ==<= 29.0
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
created 1 month, 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
None

None

Affected products

Dismissed
(max. allowed matches exceeded)
Permalink CVE-2026-62389
8.7 HIGH
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 4.0
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Attack Requirement (AT): None (N)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Vulnerable System Impact Confidentiality (VC): None (N)
  • Vulnerable System Impact Integrity (VI): None (N)
  • Vulnerable System Impact Availability (VA): High (H)
  • Subsequent System Impact Confidentiality (SC): None (N)
  • Subsequent System Impact Integrity (SI): None (N)
  • Subsequent System Impact Availability (SA): None (N)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Attack Requirement (MAT): None (N)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Vulnerable System Impact Confidentiality (MVC): None (N)
  • Modified Vulnerable System Impact Integrity (MVI): None (N)
  • Modified Vulnerable System Impact Availability (MVA): High (H)
  • Modified Subsequent System Impact Confidentiality (MSC): Negligible (N)
  • Modified Subsequent System Impact Integrity (MSI): Negligible (N)
  • Modified Subsequent System Impact Availability (MSA): Negligible (N)
  • Safety (S): Not Defined (X)
  • Automatable (AU): Not Defined (X)
  • Recovery (R): Not Defined (X)
  • Value Density (V): Not Defined (X)
  • Vulnerability Response Effort (RE): Not Defined (X)
  • Provider Urgency (U): Not Defined (X)
  • Confidentiality Req. (CR): Not Defined (X)
  • Integrity Req. (IR): Not Defined (X)
  • Availability Req. (AR): Not Defined (X)
  • Exploit Maturity (E): Not Defined (X)
created 1 month, 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (max. allowed matches exceeded) suggestion
ws < 8.21.1 Default maxFragments Allows Memory Exhaustion DoS

ws before 8.21.1 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability in lib/receiver.js where the fragment guard only triggers when fragment count reaches maxFragments, allowing attackers to exhaust memory by sending incomplete fragmented WebSocket messages. Attackers can send a text frame with FIN=0 followed by continuation frames without completing the sequence, causing each fragment to be stored as a separate Buffer object with significant overhead, enabling denial of service through heap exhaustion.

Affected products

ws
  • <8.21.1
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink CVE-2026-40958
2.3 LOW
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 4.0
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Attack Requirement (AT): Present (P)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): Passive (P)
  • Vulnerable System Impact Confidentiality (VC): None (N)
  • Vulnerable System Impact Integrity (VI): None (N)
  • Vulnerable System Impact Availability (VA): Low (L)
  • Subsequent System Impact Confidentiality (SC): None (N)
  • Subsequent System Impact Integrity (SI): None (N)
  • Subsequent System Impact Availability (SA): None (N)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Attack Requirement (MAT): Present (P)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): Passive (P)
  • Modified Vulnerable System Impact Confidentiality (MVC): None (N)
  • Modified Vulnerable System Impact Integrity (MVI): None (N)
  • Modified Vulnerable System Impact Availability (MVA): Low (L)
  • Modified Subsequent System Impact Confidentiality (MSC): Negligible (N)
  • Modified Subsequent System Impact Integrity (MSI): Negligible (N)
  • Modified Subsequent System Impact Availability (MSA): Negligible (N)
  • Safety (S): Not Defined (X)
  • Automatable (AU): Not Defined (X)
  • Recovery (R): Not Defined (X)
  • Value Density (V): Not Defined (X)
  • Vulnerability Response Effort (RE): Not Defined (X)
  • Provider Urgency (U): Not Defined (X)
  • Confidentiality Req. (CR): Not Defined (X)
  • Integrity Req. (IR): Not Defined (X)
  • Availability Req. (AR): Not Defined (X)
  • Exploit Maturity (E): Not Defined (X)
created 1 month, 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
Input validation error in Secure Access clients prior to 14.55

CVE-2026-40958 is a input validation error in Secure Access clients prior to 14.55. Attackers with intimate knowledge of and total control over the tunnel protocol can create a non-persistent DoS against their client.

Affected products

Secure Access
  • <14.55
Dismissed
(max. allowed matches exceeded)
Permalink CVE-2026-59950
7.6 HIGH
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 4.0
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Attack Requirement (AT): Present (P)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): Passive (P)
  • Vulnerable System Impact Confidentiality (VC): High (H)
  • Vulnerable System Impact Integrity (VI): High (H)
  • Vulnerable System Impact Availability (VA): None (N)
  • Subsequent System Impact Confidentiality (SC): None (N)
  • Subsequent System Impact Integrity (SI): None (N)
  • Subsequent System Impact Availability (SA): None (N)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Attack Requirement (MAT): Present (P)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): Passive (P)
  • Modified Vulnerable System Impact Confidentiality (MVC): High (H)
  • Modified Vulnerable System Impact Integrity (MVI): High (H)
  • Modified Vulnerable System Impact Availability (MVA): None (N)
  • Modified Subsequent System Impact Confidentiality (MSC): Negligible (N)
  • Modified Subsequent System Impact Integrity (MSI): Negligible (N)
  • Modified Subsequent System Impact Availability (MSA): Negligible (N)
  • Safety (S): Not Defined (X)
  • Automatable (AU): Not Defined (X)
  • Recovery (R): Not Defined (X)
  • Value Density (V): Not Defined (X)
  • Vulnerability Response Effort (RE): Not Defined (X)
  • Provider Urgency (U): Not Defined (X)
  • Confidentiality Req. (CR): Not Defined (X)
  • Integrity Req. (IR): Not Defined (X)
  • Availability Req. (AR): Not Defined (X)
  • Exploit Maturity (E): Not Defined (X)
created 1 month, 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (max. allowed matches exceeded) suggestion
MCP Python SDK: WebSocket server transport does not support Host/Origin validation

The MCP Python SDK, called mcp on PyPI, is a Python implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Prior to 1.28.1, the deprecated mcp.server.websocket.websocket_server transport accepted WebSocket handshakes without applying Host or Origin header validation, leaving no SDK-level way to restrict which origins could connect to applications that exposed that transport. This issue is fixed in version 1.28.1.

Affected products

python-sdk
  • ==< 1.28.1
Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
created 1 month, 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
None

None

Affected products

Dismissed
(no matching packages found)
Permalink CVE-2026-20153
7.5 HIGH
  • CVSS version (CVSS): 3.1
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality (C): None (N)
  • Integrity (I): None (N)
  • Availability (A): High (H)
  • Modified Attack Vector (MAV): Network (N)
  • Modified Attack Complexity (MAC): Low (L)
  • Modified Privileges Required (MPR): None (N)
  • Modified User Interaction (MUI): None (N)
  • Modified Confidentiality (MC): None (N)
  • Modified Scope (MS): Unchanged (U)
  • Modified Integrity (MI): None (N)
  • Modified Availability (MA): High (H)
created 1 month, 2 weeks ago Activity log
  • Created & dismissed (no matching packages found) suggestion
Cisco RoomOS Security Hardening Release - Input Validation Vulnerabilities

As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco RoomOS engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20153 are related to improper input validation that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-20.

Affected products

Cisco RoomOS Software
  • ==RoomOS 11.23.1.6
  • ==RoomOS 10.19 StepUpg
  • ==RoomOS 11.24.1.5
  • ==RoomOS 11.14.2.3
  • ==RoomOS 10.15.2.2
  • ==RoomOS 10.3.2.0
  • ==RoomOS 26.4.1.4
  • ==RoomOS 11.14.2.1
  • ==RoomOS 11.28.1.3
  • ==RoomOS 11.1.3.1
  • ==RoomOS 10.19.3.0
  • ==RoomOS 11.14.4.0
  • ==RoomOS 11.33.1.7
  • ==RoomOS 26.3.1.3
  • ==RoomOS 10.15.4.1
  • ==RoomOS 11.32.4.0
  • ==RoomOS 26.5.2.0
  • ==RoomOS 10.8.4.0
  • ==RoomOS 11.20.2.3
  • ==RoomOS 11.5.2.4
  • ==RoomOS 11.14.5.0
  • ==RoomOS 11.9.3.1
  • ==RoomOS 11.27.3.0
  • ==RoomOS 10.11.3.0
  • ==RoomOS 10.11.6.0
  • ==RoomOS 10.3.2.4
  • ==RoomOS 11.34.1.2
  • ==RoomOS 10.19.5.6
  • ==RoomOS 11.27.2.0
  • ==RoomOS 11.14.3.0
  • ==RoomOS 10.3.4.0
  • ==RoomOS 26.1.1.5
  • ==RoomOS 11.24.3.0
  • ==RoomOS 26.0.1.2
  • ==RoomOS 11.1.4.1
  • ==RoomOS 11.23.1.8
  • ==RoomOS 10.11.5.2
  • ==RoomOS 10.19.4.2
  • ==RoomOS 11.9.2.4
  • ==RoomOS 11.31.1.5
  • ==RoomOS 10.3.3.0
  • ==RoomOS 10.11.2.2
  • ==RoomOS 11.17.3.0
  • ==RoomOS 11.24.4.1
  • ==RoomOS 10.15.3.0
  • ==RoomOS 10.8.3.1
  • ==RoomOS 11.38.1.1
  • ==RoomOS 11.17.4.0
  • ==RoomOS 11.5.4.6
  • ==RoomOS 26.4.1.6
  • ==RoomOS 11.5.3.3
  • ==RoomOS 11.32.3.0
  • ==RoomOS 11.37.1.0
  • ==RoomOS 10.11.4.1
  • ==RoomOS 10.19.2.2
  • ==RoomOS 26.2.2.2
  • ==RoomOS 11.32.5.1
  • ==RoomOS 11.35.1.2
  • ==RoomOS 11.1.2.4
  • ==RoomOS 11.17.2.2
  • ==RoomOS 11.24.2.4
  • ==RoomOS 11.27.5.0
  • ==RoomOS 11.36.1.1
  • ==RoomOS 10.8.2.5
  • ==RoomOS 11.32.2.1
  • ==RoomOS 10.15.5.3
  • ==RoomOS 11.20.3.0
  • ==RoomOS 11.27.4.0